If you’re remotely interested in blogging, science fiction or maybe just the internet in general, then you’re bound to have encountered Cory Doctorow. He’s like a the bespectacled little demi-god of the intertubes; even if you don’t worship him, you know he’s out there, looking down at you from somewhere… preaching knowingly about Creative Commons… linking your blog post from his hugely popular Boing Boing site… or getting blurbed by the omniscient being known as Neil Gaiman:
I’d recommend Little Brother over pretty much any book I’ve read this year, and I’d want to get it into the hands of as many smart teenagers, male and female, as I can.
Because I think it’ll change lives. Because some kids, maybe just a few, won’t be the same after they’ve read it. Maybe they’ll change politically, maybe technologically. Maybe it’ll just be the first book they loved or that spoke to their inner geek. Maybe they’ll want to argue about it and disagree with it. Maybe they’ll want to open their computer and see what’s in there. I don’t know. It made me want to be 13 again right now and reading it for the first time, and then go out and make the world better or stranger or odder. It’s a wonderful, important book, in a way that renders its flaws pretty much meaningless.
– Neil Gaiman, on “Little Brother” by Cory Doctorow
Ever since I read that on Neil Gaiman’s Journal, I’ve been reeling to get my hands on this book, ’cause every book I’ve read that Neil Gaiman has vouched for have been remarkable reading experiences. “The Wizard Knight” by Gene Wolfe has got a Gaiman quote, and I loved it. “Heart-Shaped Box” by Joe Hill got a quote, and he’s now one of my favourite authors out there. So yeah, I was picking this up as soon as possible. And guess what? Neil was right about “Little Brother”, too.
Now there’s a shocker if I ever saw one.

The fact that this is a Young Adult book wasn’t going to stop me. I’ve read enough YA by now to know that the genre holds a lot of good books (“The Inferior” by Peadar Ó Guilín, “Under My Roof” by Nick Mamatas), and I know that Cory Doctorow is never going to write anything that falls short off wickedly smart. He’s just that kind of writer. Besides, when people on the net are going around saying it’s one the most important books of the century, I’m clever enough to sit up and take notice of it.
“Little Brother” is set some time into a future America. Exactly when is not specified, but stuff like 9/11 being fresh on people’s mind and the fact that people are still bitching about how bad the last president was seems to indicate that were not looking too far into the noughties. The story is about a high-school student named Marcus who’s forced to take notice of the way the government is disregarding old, fundamental rights, invading people’s privacy and in general not acting the way it should. All this escalates when terrorists decides to blow up some buildings in his home town, killing thousands upon thousands of Californians while they’re at it. The Department of Homeland Security seizes this opportunity to take away even more of the public’s privileges and practically turning Marcus’ city into a police state. Someone has to do something about this, and it sure as hell isn’t going to be the adults. No, it’s going to have to be Marcus and his friends’s job to take down the DHS, get their freedom back and save the country from destroying itself. No small feat for a guy who doesn’t even get straight A-s.
As far as Doctorow’s technical writing chops go, I gotta say that I’m not exactly impressed or awed in the slightest. His prose flows nicely from beginning to end, and the book is very well paced apart from a some missteps that were probably included to break up the rather heavy subject material into more digestible parts. The characterization isn’t very complicated, either; the bad guys are Bad and the good guys are without failure Good, and since this is Marcus’ show all the way, you end up with a fairly enjoyable, yet ultimately one-dimensional supporting cast.
Now, normally these would be things that took a lot of the fun out of the novel for me, but no so with “Little Brother”. I’m not saying that I totally disregard them either – flaws are flaws no matter how you look at them – but some flaws are easier to forgive then others when you’re given a context to understand them in. Besides, if you’re thinking of reading this book because of its literary qualities, then you’re in the wrong part of the book shop, my friend.
Because “Little Brother” is all about the Messages, and Doctorow is smart enough to go about them in a way that doesn’t feel like he’s hitting you over the head with his Mace o’ Politics. This book is about someone growing up in a world where the authorities lull they’re citizens into not thinking for themselves and taking everything without questioning the content. And that’s why it’s such an important book, because in a world that allows George W. Bush to get elected and prisoners of war to get tortured in Guantanamo, it could serve as a wake-up call to the new generation.
It’s also a really cool book. At least that’s why I thought, but then I’m generally quite interested in hacking, LARPing, ARGing, how to build computers and learning more about my security and how to protect my privacy. “Little Brother” teaches you about all these things and many more, and I felt genuinely enlightened after I put it down. I wanted to sit down next to my lap-top and google every single thing that Doctorow talks about. I wanted to learn how I could detect pin-head cameras by using toilet paper. I wanted to hack an Xbox.
That was the point with this book, and it got it across really well. I don’t normally do this with every good book I read, but I’m going to make sure that all my local librarians gets told of this book (I know three of them personally), and I’m going to make sure that every kid in my area gets the opportunity to read “Little Brother”, and maybe grow up a little smarter for it. If nothing else, it’ll be good for my cosmic karma.
This is not a literary masterpiece, but it’s rich in so many other ways that nothing should stop you from getting a hold of it. Who cares that it’s aimed at someone who’s younger than you? This book is more important that 99 % of the science fiction published this year.
I’m off to the library now.
I hope I’ll see you there.
9.0 /10

Dude, you’re close to selling ME on this, and I’m not one fig interested in computers and science-fiction is two or three steps down on my ladder of genres of choice… So that’s impressive!
^^
Nice to hear, Loki, though I’d be surprised if you were downright negative towards something that had a Gaiman quote…
Computers aren’t exactly my top choice of discussion either, but this book made them, and countless other subjects, a lot more interesting.
Oh, I’d consider voting for fracking Hagen if he got a Gaiman-quote, but considering aint the same as blindly accepting.
No, of course not. Vile rumours have it that Neil is a scientologist (his father is one of the leaders in the UK and Neil himself was an active member in his youth), so if he started pimping that cult, I’d of course back away, shut my eyes and sing la-la-la-la till he stopped talking.
I don’t know if it’s true, though, and even if it wasn’t I wouldn’t care so long as he acts the way he’s done so far about it. It’s his business what he believes, and that’s that. Note that this is of course strictly hypothetical.
Whoops! Is this what we call a sidetrack?
I do believe this is what WE call a sidetrack and MOST people call somewhere east of any path known to man. Standards are, as most things, relative.
great in-depth review! you got a knack at getting people excited about a book and that is a priceless thing.
cheers!
Glad to hear that you liked the review / rave, thrindir. I don’t know whether it can be described as “in-depth” just because it was long, though
Ah, sounds like true SF in the spirit of the Great Guru Bringsværd: SF that is about the world here and now, not the future. (Sorry for this redundant spelling out of something which to us, I’m sure, is obvious, but it really is sad to see how many people actually believe that SF is about trying to predict the future…)
I too might talk to my librarians about this one. (I know all three or four of them, and both I and my sister occasionally work at the library when they need us to.)
“If nothing else, it’ll be good for my cosmic karma.”
Ah, good, reduces the chance of you getting hit by an earthquake. I’m all for it.
“Vile rumours have it that Neil is a scientologist”
You know, you really scared the living bejeezus outta me there for a second, but then I remembered that Neil is way too intelligent to buy into all that Thetan bullcrap. (*crossing fingers, and even considering to sacrifice a small woodland animal to the Valfather, just in case*)
Oh, and speaking of Gaiman cover comments; I bought “Lud-in-the-Mist” by Hope Mirrlees about a year ago, and on its cover Neil said something along the lines of it being the most undeservedly underestimated Fantasy novel out there, and that everyone ought to read it.
Just so, you know, you know.
Also, speaking of Lud-in-the-Mist, I’m currently annoyed at myself for picking up Fletcher Pratt’s The Well of the Unicorn instead of Lud, as I’m becoming more and more certain that Fantasy written before the mid-70s clearly isn’t my cup of tea. Too much trying to emulate the German styles, with archaic vocabulary, an well-nigh indeschifferable syntax (the bastard hibe away the subject at the end! THE BASTARDS!), and pretty stock Norse/Medieval settings. Granted, The Well isn’t as obviously picaresque as, say, Leiber’s Lankhmar, of which I only managed to read two or three novellas, but it’s still a wee bit too old-fashioned for my taste.
(I’m gonna take the liberty of posting this semi-irrelevant rant here, Amras, as it seems you guys were a bit west (yes, that’s how far east you’d gone
) of any path known to men.)
*the bastards hide
I’d love to read “Lud-in-the-Mists”, but seeing as I’ve known for quite some time now that you have it, I thought I’d wait around for you to tell me how good it is. Granted, I’d've thought you’d read it by now…
Yes, that’s what people call an _incentive_, Terje. Now go read that book so you can quit reading things that annoy you
And I hope you’ll give “Little Brother” a try yourself
“I’d love to read “Lud-in-the-Mists”, but seeing as I’ve known for quite some time now that you have it, I thought I’d wait around for you to tell me how good it is. Granted, I’d’ve thought you’d read it by now…”
Seeing as you’ve been waiting, I’ll postpone Poul Anderson’s The Broken Sword or Three Hearts and Three Lions (or the other way around) ’till this Autumn, pack Lud and read it as soon as I’m done with The Well of the Unicorn and Last Argument of Kings (which I’m looking greatly forward to).
Mind you, this means that I have to postpone Guy Gavriel Kay’s The Lions of Al-Rassan as well, a novel I’ve been looking for and looking forward to for years now. Just so you know how much I sacrifice for YOUR sake.
Oh, and just a few minutes after I posted the above comment, I deigned to check the publishing date og Lud, only to discover that it is in fact a whopping 22 bloody years OLDER than The Well. Which bodes, you know, “well” for my expectations to it…
Oh, now I feel terrible!
… I think I’ll return to my copy of “Crimson Guard” to soothe my nerves
Ye bastard.
Wait, Crimson Guard is out? Or is this some advance copy or something?
ARC = Advance Reader Copy
Right. As I thought. And when’s it out for real?
15 August, according to Wikipedia.
Ah. It’ll be a Malazan fall for me, then.
It’s actually already out as a special, two-book edition from PS Publishing, but they’ve only printed 300 copies of ‘em, and they’ll cost you half a foot and two parts of a kidney.
I’m not THAT eager, thanks.